Видео

If gravity is just the curvature of space, then what if it’s not detectable on a quantum level because it’s such a small distance that it’s negligible.

Really overstated imo. They're all just tools for making music.

I know a guy named Bruce that was poisoned by a gamma wave creator and he’s ultra smart know and crazy strong. He’s also a member of the avengers

Amazing!

I love that you take inspo from gospel, the song is a banger, I can't wait for it to drop. I am agnostic at the moment but i love the sound and PJ Morton is one of my fave, he has a similar sound and it does sound great live as well.

Goodbye 🫂❤

He is spot on about analog vs digital. Visionary. RIP

That reptiles and mammals developed independently from fish as claimed in the introduction is so wrong that I guess the rest of the video has to be taken with a level of skepticism.

So according to this theory Cannibalism gonna way to have more bigger brain.

If everyone thinks the same, it's because one person is thinking for all the others.

I think it's interesting how she takes the Soviet Union as the example for fake news and echo chambers, without being able to acknowledge (at least she didn't say it) that the place where she comes from also has suffered from the same issues. Hence, displaying her own echo chamber.

She started by saying how energy expensive our brains are and finished with how important metabolic efficiency is...

Philosophy of Science and Epistemology The shift to quantum, first-person formalisms has profound implications for our understanding of scientific inquiry, knowledge, and epistemology. Classical epistemology has been heavily influenced by the ideal of an objective, detached observer acquiring knowledge about an independent, external reality. However, the quantum realm challenges this view by highlighting the fundamental inseparability of the observer and the observed system. The both/and logic, with its emphasis on the coherence and synthesis of subjective and objective aspects, provides a framework for reconceptualizing the nature of scientific knowledge. Rather than viewing knowledge as a mere representation or mapping of an external reality, we can understand it as a co-constituted process involving the irreducible perspectives of observers and the systems under study. Let O represent an observer, S represent a system, and K represent scientific knowledge: Truth(K is objective) = 0.6 Truth(K involves subjective aspects) = 0.7 Coherence(K is objective, K involves subjective aspects) = 0.8 The high coherence value reflects the idea that scientific knowledge is neither purely objective nor purely subjective, but rather a synthesis of both aspects. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent this integrated understanding: "K is objective" ⊕ "K involves subjective aspects" = scientific_knowledge(O, S) This reconceptualization challenges the classical notion of knowledge as a detached representation of an external reality and acknowledges the active role of observers in shaping and co-constituting scientific knowledge. Furthermore, the both/and logic and monadological framework provide tools for modeling the contextuality and observer-dependence inherent in quantum phenomena. This has implications for our understanding of scientific objectivity and the universality of scientific laws and theories. Let T represent a scientific theory, and C represent a particular context or experimental setup: Truth(T holds universally) = 0.7 Truth(T depends on context C) = 0.6 Coherence(T holds universally, T depends on context C) = 0.5 The moderate coherence value reflects the tension between the desire for universal scientific laws and the recognition that scientific theories may be context-dependent and observer-relative within the quantum realm. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent a more integrated understanding: "T holds universally" ⊕ "T depends on context C" = contextual_scientific_theory(T, C) This shift challenges the classical ideal of universal, context-independent scientific laws and theories and acknowledges the potential for observer-dependence and contextuality within the quantum realm. Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness The transition to quantum, first-person formalisms also has profound implications for our understanding of consciousness and the mind-body problem. Classical approaches have often treated the mind and consciousness as separate from the physical world, leading to various forms of dualism or reductionism. However, the both/and logic and monadological framework provide a basis for reconceptualizing the relationship between mind and matter. Let M represent the mental or subjective aspect, and P represent the physical or objective aspect: Truth(M is distinct from P) = 0.5 Truth(M is integrated with P) = 0.6 Coherence(M is distinct from P, M is integrated with P) = 0.7 The high coherence value reflects the idea that the mental and physical aspects are neither completely distinct nor fully reducible to each other, but rather exist in a state of coherent integration. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent this integrated understanding: "M is distinct from P" ⊕ "M is integrated with P" = mind-matter_relationship This view challenges both classical dualism and reductionism and acknowledges the irreducible co-constitution of subjective and objective aspects within a unified reality. Furthermore, the monadological framework, with its emphasis on fundamental psychophysical monads, provides a basis for reconceptualizing consciousness as an irreducible aspect of reality, rather than an emergent property or epiphenomenon. This challenges the classical view of consciousness as a mere by-product of physical processes and acknowledges its fundamental role in shaping and co-constituting reality. Let C represent consciousness, and R represent physical reality: Truth(C is an epiphenomenon of R) = 0.4 Truth(C co-constitutes R) = 0.7 Coherence(C is an epiphenomenon of R, C co-constitutes R) = 0.6 The moderate coherence value reflects the tension between the classical view of consciousness as an epiphenomenon and the quantum view of consciousness as an active co-constituent of reality. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent a more integrated understanding: "C is an epiphenomenon of R" ⊕ "C co-constitutes R" = consciousness-reality_relationship This shift challenges the classical reductionist view of consciousness and acknowledges its fundamental role in shaping and co-constituting reality, aligning with the principles of the monadological framework. Foundations of Mathematics and Logic The transition to quantum, first-person formalisms also has implications for our understanding of the foundations of mathematics and logic themselves. Classical mathematics and logic have been heavily influenced by the ideals of objectivity, universality, and context-independence. However, the both/and logic and monadological framework challenge these notions and provide a basis for reconceptualizing the nature of mathematical and logical truth. Let T represent a mathematical or logical truth, and O represent an observer or context: Truth(T is universal) = 0.7 Truth(T depends on observer O) = 0.6 Coherence(T is universal, T depends on observer O) = 0.5 The moderate coherence value reflects the tension between the classical view of mathematical and logical truths as universal and context-independent, and the quantum view of truth as observer-dependent and context-sensitive. The synthesis operator ⊕ can then represent a more integrated understanding: "T is universal" ⊕ "T depends on observer O" = contextual_mathematical_truth(T, O) This view challenges the classical notion of timeless, objective mathematical and logical truths and acknowledges the potential for observer-dependence and contextuality within these domains, aligning with the principles of the monadological framework. Furthermore, the both/and logic itself provides a basis for reconceptualizing the foundations of logic by embracing multivalence, paraconsistency, and the coherence of seemingly contradictory propositions. This challenges the classical principles of bivalence and non-contradiction and opens up new possibilities for representing and reasoning about the paradoxical and contextual nature of truth within the quantum realm. These are just a few examples of how the transition from classical, third-person formalisms to quantum, first-person formalisms enabled by the both/and logic and monadological framework has profound implications across various domains. By embracing these new formalisms and conceptual frameworks, we can develop a more holistic, integrated, and contextualized understanding of reality, one that acknowledges the irreducible perspectives of observers, the co-constitutive nature of subjective and objective aspects, and the potential for contextuality and observer-dependence within the quantum realm.

Jesus. So much nonsense in such a short video.

Want to improve your creative intelligence ability? Disrupt your Default mode network (DMN) with micro-dosed Psilocybin and LSD, and meditation....

i have 5

I looove this!!! More of that!!! ❤️❤️✨

Group think and fear dosent mean they didn’t have accurate points to make. And have you tried to get a highly open person to talk with low openess person with high disgust sensitivity. It’s like two totally different worlds.

I think it just tells us that genes are overhyped and oversold and that genotype very likely has little to do with determining phenotype

you're fire in a good way.

Crazy is smart

is time travel to past future really possible i want to do i am from india please help me out

is time travel to past future really possible i want to do i am from india please help me out

is time travel to past future really possible i want to do i am from india please help me out

I believe the technical term is hangry.

To me Analog is the only real way , digital isn't good at all

You are me new hero. Thank you for theoretical conversations, thank you for not being afraid of voicing your ideas and work.

The Age of Life The ability to carry out actions differentiates inanimate matter from living matter. In turn, every action involves the management of Information. We do not know what Matter is or what Life is, and we assume that all life forms that currently inhabit the planet descend from a common ancestor (LUCA), an organism whose complexity is evident if we consider that it is attributed the ability to reproduce. Due to the above, it is reasonable to assume that “seeds of life” existed prior to LUCA. Assuming that the “seeds of life” emerged together with the Big Bang is a bold postulate, and as such requires a solid empirical foundation. When observing Evolution considering the information that our ancestors have managed, and that currently managed by humanity, it is possible to distinguish seven evolutionary milestones; Its analysis allows us to postulate that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe, and the existence of an “evolutionary pattern” is evident, which turns out to be the Golden Ratio. Evolutionary Milestones -Emergence of ”Seeds of Life”(1) (thirteen thousand eight hundred million years ago). -Emergence of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) three thousand eight hundred million years ago -Emergence of the brain (five hundred and fifty million years ago). -Emergence of what was the precursor of human language (2) (twenty-seven million years ago) -Emergence of the language that characterizes us(3) (around two hundred and twenty thousand years ago). -Emergence of “the information age” with the transistor (1950) -Evolutionary Singularity(4) proposed by Ray Kurzweil, who postulates that humanity will access a Singularity as a result of the exponential growth of information management (year 2045). Evolutionary sections Among successive evolutionary milestones we can distinguish the following six “Evolutionary Tranches”, with the duration indicated (in years): Tranche 1: 10,000,000,000 (13,800,000,000 - 3,800,000,000 = 10,000,000,000) Tranche 2: 3,250,000,000 (3,800,000,000 - 550,000,000 = 3,250,000,000) Tranche 3: 523,000,000 (550,000,000 - 27,000,000 = 523,000,000) Tranche 4: 26,780,000 (27,000,000 - 220,000 = 26,780,000) Tranche 5: 219,905 (220,000 - 95(5) = 219,905) Tranche 6: 95 (95 - 0 = 95) The particular variation experienced by the Evolutionary Sections over time suggests using the logarithm of said sections (LT) to analyze their behavior over time. The logarithms in question are as follows: LT1 = 10.0000 LT2 = 9.51188 LT3 = 8.71850 LT4 = 7.42781 LT5 = 5.34224 LT6 = 1.97772 The lines between two successive logarithms have the following slopes (P) P1 = -0.48812 (9.51188 - 10.0000 = -0.48812) P2 = -0.79338 (8.71850 - 9.51188 = -0.79338) P3 = -1.29069 (7.42781 - 8.71850 = -1.29069) P4 = -2.08557 (5.34224 - 7.42781 = -2.08557) P5 = -3.36452 (1.97772 - 5.34224 = -3.36452) After searching for an “evolutionary pattern” we will determine the variation between successive slopes, which is given by the Ratio (R) between them, that is, P2/P1; P3/P2; P4/P3; P5/P4, and is the following: R1 = 1.62538 R2 = 1.62682 R3 = 1.61586 R4 = 1.61324 The above values differ from the Golden Number (1.61803), a number also called the golden number, the number of God, the extreme and average ratio, the golden ratio, the golden mean, the golden ratio and the divine ratio, by 0.45%; 0.54%; 0.13% and 0.30%, respectively. In turn, the average of the sum of the ratios is 1.62032. This value differs from the golden ratio by 0.14%. The results obtained allow us to postulate that Evolution follows a pattern that is a function of Information and the golden ratio, and that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe. (1)The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is the putative common ancestral cell from which the three domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, originated. The complexity that LUCA is assumed to have does not give rise to affirming that it arose by “spontaneous generation”, it being valid to postulate the pre-existence of “seeds of life” prior to the emergence of LUCA; It is postulated that the origin of the “seeds of life” dates back to the moment when Matter arose in the Universe, that is, around thirteen thousand eight hundred million years. (2)“We find that the anatomical potential to produce and perceive sounds differentiated by their formants began at the latest by the time of our last common ancestor with Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea) about 27 Ma ago”; " Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech” (Science magazine) (3) The last change in the position of the hyoid bone in humans, which would have allowed access to the language that characterizes us, took place approximately two hundred and twenty thousand years ago, and its data is based on archaeological evidence and anthropological studies. There is no scientific source that records this change on an exact date. (4)Due to the exponential growth of information technologies, Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Technological Singularity will occur in the year 2045, at which time technological growth will be so rapid and so profound that it will be impossible to predict what its consequences will be. (5) It is the time between 1950 and 2045, the latter year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Singularity will take place.

The Age of Life The ability to carry out actions differentiates inanimate matter from living matter. In turn, every action involves the management of Information. We do not know what Matter is or what Life is, and we assume that all life forms that currently inhabit the planet descend from a common ancestor (LUCA), an organism whose complexity is evident if we consider that it is attributed the ability to reproduce. Due to the above, it is reasonable to assume that “seeds of life” existed prior to LUCA. Assuming that the “seeds of life” emerged together with the Big Bang is a bold postulate, and as such requires a solid empirical foundation. When observing Evolution considering the information that our ancestors have managed, and that currently managed by humanity, it is possible to distinguish seven evolutionary milestones; Its analysis allows us to postulate that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe, and the existence of an “evolutionary pattern” is evident, which turns out to be the Golden Ratio. Evolutionary Milestones -Emergence of ”Seeds of Life”(1) (thirteen thousand eight hundred million years ago). -Emergence of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) three thousand eight hundred million years ago -Emergence of the brain (five hundred and fifty million years ago). -Emergence of what was the precursor of human language (2) (twenty-seven million years ago) -Emergence of the language that characterizes us(3) (around two hundred and twenty thousand years ago). -Emergence of “the information age” with the transistor (1950) -Evolutionary Singularity(4) proposed by Ray Kurzweil, who postulates that humanity will access a Singularity as a result of the exponential growth of information management (year 2045). Evolutionary sections Among successive evolutionary milestones we can distinguish the following six “Evolutionary Tranches”, with the duration indicated (in years): Tranche 1: 10,000,000,000 (13,800,000,000 - 3,800,000,000 = 10,000,000,000) Tranche 2: 3,250,000,000 (3,800,000,000 - 550,000,000 = 3,250,000,000) Tranche 3: 523,000,000 (550,000,000 - 27,000,000 = 523,000,000) Tranche 4: 26,780,000 (27,000,000 - 220,000 = 26,780,000) Tranche 5: 219,905 (220,000 - 95(5) = 219,905) Tranche 6: 95 (95 - 0 = 95) The particular variation experienced by the Evolutionary Sections over time suggests using the logarithm of said sections (LT) to analyze their behavior over time. The logarithms in question are as follows: LT1 = 10.0000 LT2 = 9.51188 LT3 = 8.71850 LT4 = 7.42781 LT5 = 5.34224 LT6 = 1.97772 The lines between two successive logarithms have the following slopes (P) P1 = -0.48812 (9.51188 - 10.0000 = -0.48812) P2 = -0.79338 (8.71850 - 9.51188 = -0.79338) P3 = -1.29069 (7.42781 - 8.71850 = -1.29069) P4 = -2.08557 (5.34224 - 7.42781 = -2.08557) P5 = -3.36452 (1.97772 - 5.34224 = -3.36452) After searching for an “evolutionary pattern” we will determine the variation between successive slopes, which is given by the Ratio (R) between them, that is, P2/P1; P3/P2; P4/P3; P5/P4, and is the following: R1 = 1.62538 R2 = 1.62682 R3 = 1.61586 R4 = 1.61324 The above values differ from the Golden Number (1.61803), a number also called the golden number, the number of God, the extreme and average ratio, the golden ratio, the golden mean, the golden ratio and the divine ratio, by 0.45%; 0.54%; 0.13% and 0.30%, respectively. In turn, the average of the sum of the ratios is 1.62032. This value differs from the golden ratio by 0.14%. The results obtained allow us to postulate that Evolution follows a pattern that is a function of Information and the golden ratio, and that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe. (1)The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is the putative common ancestral cell from which the three domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, originated. The complexity that LUCA is assumed to have does not give rise to affirming that it arose by “spontaneous generation”, it being valid to postulate the pre-existence of “seeds of life” prior to the emergence of LUCA; It is postulated that the origin of the “seeds of life” dates back to the moment when Matter arose in the Universe, that is, around thirteen thousand eight hundred million years. (2)“We find that the anatomical potential to produce and perceive sounds differentiated by their formants began at the latest by the time of our last common ancestor with Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea) about 27 Ma ago”; " Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech” (Science magazine) (3) The last change in the position of the hyoid bone in humans, which would have allowed access to the language that characterizes us, took place approximately two hundred and twenty thousand years ago, and its data is based on archaeological evidence and anthropological studies. There is no scientific source that records this change on an exact date. (4)Due to the exponential growth of information technologies, Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Technological Singularity will occur in the year 2045, at which time technological growth will be so rapid and so profound that it will be impossible to predict what its consequences will be. (5) It is the time between 1950 and 2045, the latter year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Singularity will take place.

I personally hate ruts and don't find it comfortable. I've seen how my thoughts have progressed over my lifetime and realize that I'm probably always wrong to some extent and therefore don't want to get too comfortable. Also, I actually get a sort of high when I get out of ruts.; That being said, obviously there are deeply ingrained thinking habits that probably will never be changed significantly, you can only work from them. You play the hand you are dealt basically. E: Damn she's a capitalist stan.

I like this guy, but honestly, why shouldn't digital recordings survive? Binary code is a very logical system that will surely be rediscovered again and again if it ever falls into oblivion.

That is a really good fucking point

I respect the hell out of him. But I highly, highly disagree with his premise. Assume an alien 1000 years from now finds a roll of Ampeg 456. Also assuming it's not completely deteriorated by then (and it would be), do you really think they're going to know how to rebuild a Studer 24-track equivalent machine to get anything meaningful from that tape? Will they magically know 15ips from 30ips?!? And ultimately find what... some unmixed Ohio Players tracks? Please... that's not a historical record. However, data discs, data tapes, the "cloud", whatever... as soon as you decode the simple binary makeup of our digital storage, it all comes back: our music; our written records and art; our photography; basically our whole existence. We are already almost to the point of perpetually retrievable storage methods that would survive even a global holocaust. The "global archive of everything" preserved in near and outer space, underground and bouncing between satellites is not that far away. We have no idea about a Cro Magnon man from 15,000 years ago. But that Alien 1,000 years from now stands a chance to see what I ate at that nice Italian joint a couple of nights ago because I posted a pic of it on Instagram, and it's now in the Cloud. That's something.

Science can be so complex that we mortals grasp at the straw men of the religions.

she sheds light on the importance of flexibility and openness in our thinking to combat the "Einstellung" phenomenon. Remember, staying curious and embracing novel experiences can keep our minds agile and receptive to new ideas. 🧠✨

I think Dumbledore put the paradox very succinctly: “I make mistakes like the next man. In fact, being--forgive me--rather cleverer than most men, my mistakes tend to be correspondingly huger.” ― J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Frequency density-intensity alignment amplitudes are "predetermined", by the holistic superimposed sum-of-all-histories log-antilog condensation in prime-cofactor frequency number continuous condensation-coordination, this inside-outside holographic positioning resonance matrix is the bio-logical re-evolution survival chemistry mechanism here-now-forever center of relative-timing differentiates.., a concept of parallel coexistence holography, and A Rose by any other name will smell as Sweet, leaving us the task of renaming not-roses forever.

Fake news are the tools for information warfare. Both sides are throwing it and using it based upon their geo locations.

None of this will matter until they start taking Myers Briggs seriously. You want innovation/ genius? Get INTPs and INTJs together.

Goat

Honestly the best argument for analog ive heard. RIP

I always wondered if this kind of transference was even vaguely possible. I always thought the more likely scenario was changing the body and brain from the inside out, enhancing as we go, over a period of months or years to arrive at an improved state. A more powerful mind in a longer lasting, more resilient body. I called it the "scaffolding" approach, using the existing tissues as scaffolding to build something new, transferring function gradually to new structures.

My Boston Tertiary had a Jacks over nines. My Frenchy had 4 Queens and a Jokerz,

Spiriituality can never be explained by science.. Spirituality begins where science ends.. Spirituality is the journey of the Atman to reach the Brahman.. Or in other words.. Dissolution of ego.. To realize the effulgent Self through Sadhana or continuous meditation.. It is beyond brain , mind or time or space... One has to contemplate on the Self to realize the Self.. No academic explanation suffices..

What would she know about geniuses? She never ever encountered one. 😅 They are a rare breed. Dude these people. 🤷

His outfit is 😎

There are two definitions of the word “genius”: 1. Someone with great mental capacities and/or creativity. 2. Someone who has a natural ease in a given area. Both are used and create confusion, as some people use the first definition, some use the second, and some use both. They are quite different, as someone with ease in, for example, neurology, may also be totally clueless in other areas, such as self-questioning. If you use the first definition, geniuses can’t be very stubborn people, as it is a proof of lack of intelligence and creativity. If you use the second definition, then SOME geniuses are indeed stubborn people. But I wouldn’t call them geniuses; I would prefer the term “immature” personally. Even so, not every genius has to be stubborn, as even if they’re often right, they aren’t always right. Thus, they can still learn from their mistakes, even if it’s harder than for most people. So, this video is a bit… arrogant? It always talks about geniuses as if every single one of them was concerned, without presenting the used definition of the term. Presenting this as being a universal truth when it’s based on personal experience isn’t very wise.

Many beliefs are NOT ‘real’. The rubbish of modern sexual politics is not based on reality, but based on a deluded, privileged fantasy of what life can be for wealthy people. It is no wonder your wide eyed presentation comes from Princeton, home is deluded and powerful woke culture. Within 25 years this rubbish will,be a distant memory, with no roots, just a disruptive phase of over privileged rich Americans.

You did a fine job Steve. RIP

Nonsense. Digital can have infinite exact backups all over the world making it immune to time, physical damage, wealth hoarding and dated physical player technology.